Your message dated Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:50:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: xlassie Version: 1.8-12 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Here is a small patch on xlassie to make it able to retrieve information from any IMAP folder. It adds a command-line option, --imapfolder, with the default value "INBOS" so that the default behaviour is unchanged. It is helpful for one who have a large IMAP box, with various folders, and a tool like imapfilter which is sorting things out in daemon mode. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages xlassie depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-7 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxt6 1:1.0.0-5 X11 toolkit intrinsics library xlassie recommends no packages. -- no debconf information Here is the patch: diff -u xlassie-1.8/xlassie.c xlassie-now/xlassie-1.8/xlassie.c --- xlassie-1.8/xlassie.c 2004-11-24 11:35:31.000000000 +0100 +++ xlassie-now/xlassie-1.8/xlassie.c 2004-11-24 11:31:15.000000000 +0100 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ int Number; int Interval=INTERVAL_SPOOL; char SpoolFile[256]; +char FolderName[1024]; char Command[256]; char Username[32]; char Password[32]; @@ -271,6 +272,7 @@ printf(" -apop3 <server> Like -pop3, but uses a diferent method.\n"); printf(" Use when -pop3 doesn't find the correct number\n"); printf(" -imap <server> Use the IMAP protocol instead of pop3\n"); + printf(" -imapfolder <folder> Use this folder instead of INBOX\n"); printf(" -username <name> Username for pop3/imap server.\n" " Use when different from local username\n"); printf(" -password <word> Password to use on pop3/imap server.\n"); @@ -299,6 +301,7 @@ { int i; int intervalused=0; + strcpy(FolderName,"INBOX"); for(i=1;i<argc;i++) { if(!strcmp(argv[i],"-fg")) { @@ -356,6 +359,9 @@ strcpy(SpoolFile,argv[i]); Options|=USE_IMAP; if(!intervalused) Interval=INTERVAL_POP3; + } else if(!strcmp(argv[i],"-imapfolder")) { + if(++i==argc) { usage(); exit(2); }; + strcpy(FolderName,argv[i]); } else if(!strcmp(argv[i],"-username")) { if(++i==argc) { usage(); exit(2); }; strcpy(Username,argv[i]); @@ -874,17 +880,23 @@ int count_mail_imap() { FILE *f; + char srch1[128]; + char srch2[128]; char buf[128]; int total=0; f = imap_login(); if(f==NULL) return -1; - fflush(f); fprintf(f, "a003 STATUS INBOX (UNSEEN)\r\n"); + verbose("To server: a003 STATUS %s (UNSEEN)\r\n",FolderName); + fflush(f); fprintf(f, "a003 STATUS %s (UNSEEN)\r\n",FolderName); fflush(f); fgets(buf, 127, f); - if(!sscanf(buf, "* STATUS INBOX (UNSEEN %d)", &total) && - !sscanf(buf, "* STATUS \"INBOX\" (UNSEEN %d)", &total)) { + sprintf(srch1,"* STATUS %s (UNSEEN %%d)",FolderName); + sprintf(srch2,"* STATUS \"%s\" (UNSEEN %%d)",FolderName); + if(!sscanf(buf, srch1, &total) && + !sscanf(buf, srch2, &total)) { fprintf(stderr, "Couldn't understand response from server\n"); + fprintf(stderr, "while searching: %s\nor %s\n",srch1,srch2); fprintf(stderr, "%s", buf); return 0; }
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version 1.8-13 which includes this patch (or a rewritten version thereof) was uploaded some time ago. I don't know why this bug didn't close automatically, but in any case this message should serve to do so manually. Please let me know if this functionality fails to work correctly. Thanks for the patch, and for your help, --Barak.
--- End Message ---
