Your message dated Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:49:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394679: fixed in kernel-package 10.063
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version: 20061017 etch daily powerpc netinst
Date: 20061017 19:30 GMT+0300
Machine: PowerMac G4 Gigabit Ethernet
Processor: single 400 MHz G4
Memory: 384M
Partitions: sda1-8 small Mac partitsions, sda9 Linux, sda10 NewWorld
Boot, sda11 swap - all on a 20G Maxtor IDE disk
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Sorry, not networked any more. ATI Rage 128 PF graphics, Sun GEM gigabit
Ethernet
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
After reboot there were 2 noticable problems.
The first is that hwclock could not be accessed with any known method
(error -22) and so the year was in the beginning on 19xx. This caused
secondary errors later.
The other problem was the configuration of xserver-xorg (I agreed to
install Desktop task). It kept asking and asking the sam question of
what video modes I would like to use, from 640x40 to 1900x.... Whatever
I chose (all/nothing/different sensible subsets in lower resolutions) it
asked the same question again, and choosing the back button also asked
it again. The only way was to kill it from another terminal. Second time
it could configure itself fine.
--
Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kernel-package
Source-Version: 10.063
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kernel-package_10.063.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.063.dsc
kernel-package_10.063.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.063.tar.gz
kernel-package_10.063_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.063_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kernel-package
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:33:28 -0500
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 10.063
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-package - A utility for building Linux kernel related Debian packages.
Closes: 391433 391436 391643 391677 394679
Changes:
kernel-package (10.063) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "kernel-package: Generated postinst fails: Missing Required
paramater 'Old'", thanks to Daniel Jacobowitz. I cleaned up the
postinst as while I was at it, going with readlink -q -m instead of
the built in version. (Closes: #391643).
* Bug fix: "[powerpc] initramfs creation fails with 2.6.18 during
install", thanks to Meelis Roos. This was fixed by the changes above.
(Closes: #394679).
* Bug fix: "kernel-package: No need for any mentioning of bin86", thanks
to Adrian Bunk (Closes: #391677).
* Bug fix: "postinst_hook runs after bootloader", thanks to Martin Buck
(Closes: #391436).
* Bug fix: "kernel-package: A Debian revision is mandatory, but none was
provided", thanks to Marc Haber. Hmm. We were not passing
DEBIAN_REVISION for the clean target, and not doing any sanity checks.
We still don't do sanity checks on clean, but we do pass along the
provided debian revision, so warning is no longer triggered.
(Closes: #391433).
Files:
e922f68358800a6203dee72c593c625a 485 misc optional kernel-package_10.063.dsc
2fb2974dfa7e3ec972ce2384ed664f6b 845130 misc optional
kernel-package_10.063.tar.gz
bf316dbca8dc696485b7a7594413490e 499904 misc optional
kernel-package_10.063_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFPQ96Ibrau78kQkwRAul9AKCSOusB7SGGL4Hk6FYeq2xFiOnXWQCgqUFy
iEP3oceFNdLKzk1taIDDmEk=
=xXKZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
