Your message dated Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:55:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383288: Re: Bug#383288: failure to add rules for one port
results in multiple rules added for other ports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fail2ban
Version: 0.6.1-10
Severity: normal
I just ran into a situation where fail2ban could not add a rule for
the SASL subsystem. Thus, it flooded the log, trying again and
again, and each time, it would execute the fwstart rules for the
other ports, so I ended up with several dozens of SSH rules added by
fail2ban's SSH target's fwstart configuration option.
If a rule fails to execute, maybe only retry it, not all rules?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (750, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (250, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages fail2ban depends on:
ii iptables 1.3.3-2 Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis
ii lsb-base 3.1-14 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii python 2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-central 0.5.5 register and build utility for Pyt
fail2ban recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Please if anyone encounters this issue -- reopen the bug - there might
be something indeed but due to recent jump in version there is high
possibility that the issue got resolved even if it was present ;-)
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> Ah, I failed to get these details back then and now I cannot
> reproduce. Sorry.
> Feel free to close this bug then, or leave it as it is. I will
> provide more information when I see the problem again.
--
.-.
=------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------=
Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User ^^-^^ [175555]
pgpL9L8yITiE8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
