Hello,

Niels Thykier, le mar. 06 août 2024 09:43:51 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault:
> > Niels Thykier, le jeu. 25 juil. 2024 16:44:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > Samuel Thibault:
> > > When the current dependency was added, the conclusion was it would
> > > solve all the cases because other implementations could add a
> > > Provides.
> > > 
> > > But at the end of the day, the bootstrap script will need to be fixed and 
> > > we
> > > are discussing when and how long you would need this work around for.
> > 
> > I'm not sure: is the discussion happening somewhere?
> 
> No, that "discussing" was a remark for you on this being time limited. I
> thought you had already filed the bug/started the discussion to be honest.

? Well, no. TBH I even believe that deboostrap will refuse such an
arrangement, because AFAIK, the principle is that Debian wants to avoid
unexpected surprises when installing dependencies at bootstrap, and thus
only look for explicited alternatives, and not for provides. A lot of
packages have thus been doing that for a long time.

Samuel

Reply via email to