Hi Don, Ben is again actice on the BTS and even after called out by David on debian-devel and myself in e.g in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999649#22
They started to undo the correction on the BTS I made earlier, and wrote me in private mail to "Do not fool around with the bugs I make and control", while clearly not understanding the processes in Debian with often comments that feel out of place commentary (e.g 994649#29 or 999649#17) This is repeated behaviour, I had the same experience in September 2023 where I tried to tell Ben about e.g the correct usage of severities for new upstream release bugs and related topic, after which they mass- closed their filed bugs (I had the impression this was kind of rage-quit action...) Now, they are doing the same thing (filing barely actionable bugs) again that has been topic of this bug, for example lot of "Missing homepage" I think it would be appropiate for some cool-down period. Thanks! -- tobi On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 21:28:22 -0700 Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023, Christoph Berg wrote: > > we keep seeing non-actionable bug reports from Ben Tris that look like > > this: > > Hi Ben, please don't file bugs like this which aren't actionable. If you > find something minor wrong with a package like this, please provide a > patch so that maintainers can see what you think is wrong and how they > should fix it. > > It looks like you've closed the non-actionable bugs that you had filed, > so I won't immediately be putting in a block for you, but if it happens > again, I will. > > Thanks! > > -- > Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com > > Thanks be to God, that he gave me Stubbornness, when I know I am right. > -- John Adams (Letter to Edmund Jennings, 27 September 1782) > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
