On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > What do you mean there? The person who draws this smilies gives the > right to distribute them. Don't see the problem.
These images might be okay because they are not the *exact* Smiley Face with the oval eyes and curves around the mouth. Googling a bit shows Wal-Mart now owns the copyright on that. But I remember historically this has come up. It *may* be the case that if you alter the eye or mouth structure it's okay. > For all the others, I am not sure that's it is forbidden to redistribute > the images, as long as you don't use the company logo, which is not the > case here. You might be right. Those Duracell and Bic images are pretty unambiguous, especially the Duracell battery since only one type of battery looks like that. I'd definitely consult a lawyer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
