tags 291673 unreproducible thanks. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu > than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used > to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the goom output > locally, but I can't with version 1.0 because it takes too much cpu, the > video studders. Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce this. 1.0-1 performs exactly as well as the RC series here. Have you possibly increased the resolution for goom? One question about your setup: You're not really running xine on your server with the goom output tunnelled through ssh's X11 forward to your workstation, are you?
