Jonas> You are still welcome to have me help: Make a package and put it Jonas> public somewhere (including sources). Then we can discuss Jonas> possible improvements and I maintain the package (with your Jonas> changes clearly declared as coming from you, off course) until Jonas> you can take it over yourself.
Jonas> I assume you want to adopt this package because you believe it is Jonas> for the good of Debian users, not only to proove your packaging Jonas> skills. Not either, really; it is for my own benefit, since I use it (indirectly), and I prefer having everything apt-able. Rene> You'll help him better doing it the usual way instead of taking Rene> over the package and make him send patches (which is in fact the Rene> case then)... I have already uploaded a diff and dsc: http://primate.net/~itz/vcg_1.30debian-2.diff.gz http://primate.net/~itz/vcg_1.30debian-2.dsc However, Jens Secher (who had offered to sponsor me the usual way) pointed out that the .orig tarball differs from the one listed in the copyright file. This is not my doing; I just took the .orig file apt-get source gave me. We (Jens, me, and previous maintainer) had some inconclusive discussion about this, and right now I don't know how to proceed. My indecision has only been reinforced by the thread below (which, too, petered out in an ambiguous way): http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00297.html -- I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write a better one in Microsoft BASIC ? Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]