On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote: > It's useful to pass to anything that accepts a GNU type, because they
That's a very weak excuse to keep this unfixed. Please document it as a BUGS entry in the dpkg-architecture manpage, at the very least. > either understand non-canonical types or canonicalise types before using > them. They *always* canonicalse types. But that can only be done safely if whatever you gave to config.sub is unique enough. For *now*, stuff lacking -gnu are good enough, so nothing breaks. BTW, what you have in the dpkg-architecture manpage about how to use the output of dpkg-architecture with autoconf would best be replaced to a pointer to the README.Debian for autotools-dev. Really. If you'd rather have it on a manpage, I can write one and add it to autotools-dev. Does autotools-dev(7) sound good? > It's suitable for "configure", and good enough for gcc; seems reasonable > to me. Since when are we about "good enough" anything? If that's the explanation, please reopen the bug and tag it wontfix. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]