Hi

On Thu 3. 2. 2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp. 
> http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html 

This is patch for gammu and it is already applied in gammu.

> and would like to hear your comments regarding the solution of 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266566.

This bug is about gnokii.

> If I understood the patches from October correctly, the bug fix is there and 
> "only" has to be applied to the debian packages ? 
> 
> My main motivation is http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kdepim

Kdepim depends on gnokii.

> Hach, is life easy if you only have to quote three URLs to convey your 
> message :-)

You should write to gnokii mailing list, I doubt anybody here follows gnokii 
development such detailly to know whether there was such change.

-- 
    Michal ÄihaÅ | http://www.cihar.com

Attachment: pgpEgCAdgMTPQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to