Hi On Thu 3. 2. 2005 13:57, Holger Levsen wrote: > I just subscribed to this list, read the archives from last summer, esp. > http://albatross.madduck.net/pipermail/gammu-legal/2004-October/000112.html
This is patch for gammu and it is already applied in gammu. > and would like to hear your comments regarding the solution of > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266566. This bug is about gnokii. > If I understood the patches from October correctly, the bug fix is there and > "only" has to be applied to the debian packages ? > > My main motivation is http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kdepim Kdepim depends on gnokii. > Hach, is life easy if you only have to quote three URLs to convey your > message :-) You should write to gnokii mailing list, I doubt anybody here follows gnokii development such detailly to know whether there was such change. -- Michal ÄihaÅ | http://www.cihar.com
pgpEgCAdgMTPQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature