Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi.dog...@ens.fr> writes: > [ Dropped CC to -release and replaced it by 667...@bugs.debian.org ] > > On 16/04/12 11:26, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be >> added to allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related >> packages: >> >> easy octave-communications/1.1.0-2 octave-control/2.3.50-1 >> octave-data-smoothing/1.3.0-2 octave-econometrics/1:1.0.8-6 >> octave-financial/0.3.2-3 octave-ga/0.9.8-3 >> octave-miscellaneous/1.1.0-1 octave-optim/1.0.17-2 >> octave-signal/1.1.2-1 octave-statistics/1.1.0-1 >> octave-struct/1.0.9-2 octave-time/1.0.9-4 octave-vrml/1.0.11-2 > >> easy octave-ocs/0.1.3-1 octave-odepkg/0.8.0-1 >> > > octave-ocs and octave-odepkg need to migrate at the same time as the > other packages. So they should be part of the big easy hint.
I don't think so, they are not in the same dependency loop. But having everything in the same hint doesn't hurt anyways. > I've added the easy hint and will be processed shortly. (So we will see > if it did work) but I still see "red" packages on the transition tracker > [1]. So the transition is now completely finished yet (as I understand > it). Am I wrong? Is anyone working on getting those "red" packages fixed? We are going to request the removal of octave-parallel and semidef-oct. The other packages are not maintained by the Debian Octave Group, so we cannot act directly. We have filed bugs against libgdf (#666894) and pfstools (#666959). A bug still needs to be filed against libsml, we’ll do it shortly. Best, -- Sébastien Villemot Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
pgpKW85G6G3n2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
