On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Paul van Tilburg <pau...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi! > > It seems that the format of the plugins has changed and that Ampache is > behind. > First of all, the .plugin file should have the header [Plugin], not [RB > Plugin]. > When you rename the file to ampache.plugin and make the change, > Rhythmbox tries to load it. However, it also doesn't seem quite up to > date with the current plugin API: > > % rhythmbox > ImportError: No module named ampache > > (rhythmbox:17197): libpeas-WARNING **: Error loading plugin 'ampache' > > So I tried linking ampache.py to __init__.py. That also didn't help: > > % rhythmbox > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/ampache/ampache.py", line 3, in <module> > import rhythmdb, rb > ImportError: No module named rhythmdb > > (rhythmbox:17281): libpeas-WARNING **: Error loading plugin 'ampache' > > I think this plugin is more broken than it seems. It either should be > updated or removed. > > Paul > > -- > Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org > Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 > >
Agreed, IMHO rhythmbox should be removed from the archive, but sadly I do not have control over that. I personally do not use Rhythmbox with ampache that much. I personally use Viridian, Banshee or Amarok. However with that said can we give upstream some more time to work on rhythmbox-ampache. I have been testing this upstream svn branch: svn checkout http://rhythmbox-ampache.googlecode.com/svn/branches/for_rhythmbox-gtk+3 Best regards -- Charlie Smotherman Debian Contributor Ubuntu Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
