On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:13:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:57:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > >However it would be nice if you could avoid breaking all our official > >buildds in the process next time. I.e. a notice *before* breaking the > >ports' users would've been helpful, especially as that change wasn't > >particularly time critical *for Debian*. > > For now I've put in an extra /lib/ld-linux.so.3 symlink on the buildds > so they can start working again immediately. Next, I'm scanning all > the machines to verify exactly which packages need > fixing/rebuilding/reinstalling. Shouldn't take too long.
To be fair, I had no way of knowing that the Debian buildds were running binaries from debian-ports (or, more accurately, binaries built against debian-ports by DSA). The revelation was somewhat of a shock to me, as I've had very little (ie: nothing) to do with the Debian armhf buildds. Apologies for the breakage, but it seems like Steve has things well in hand by now. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
