Le 04/30/2012 11:16 PM, Michael Biebl a écrit : > No reply since you poked upstream about this issue over a month ago. > Is this package still actively developed upstream? Should it be removed > from the Debian archive? > We really do not want to ship 4 vala versions in wheezy and awn is the > last package depending on vala-0.10. > Updating to vala-0.12 won't help much either, since this is the other > versions scheduled to be removed. > > If you want to keep awn, would you be willing to take over maintenance > of valac-0.10? Please keep in mind though, that this version is no > longer maintained upstream. I ping some devs from upstream to see if they can help. However, I may have some time to migrate it myself, not in the coming days, but before the freeze of June. In the meantime, you can remove it if it's a blocking item.
I don't want to take the maintenance of vala 0.10 only for Awn. If I can't migrate it, it should be removed from the archive. However, I still think it's a useful application, with not yet a real alternative. It could be useful for wheezy at this current state (even if the development stopped), and be reconsidered for wheezy+1. Regards, Julien Lavergne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
