also sprach Thilo Uttendorfer <deb...@uttendorfer.net> [2012.05.01.1429 +0200]: > No, this is a misunderstanding: If you configure logsurfer properly it > can replace logcheck. I just would not use it that way (just my opinion), > because the nice thing with logcheck is that the rules are very simple > and a lot of other packages ship already their own rules for logcheck.
logcheck is a catastrophe and the rules are not standardised and thorough mess! > > Can logsurfer only execute an action when a filter (?) matches? The > > nice thing about logcheck was that it always fired except if an > > exception matched, which is the proper way to do it! > > You can configure logsurfer that way as well. Good! Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "first get your facts; then you can distort them at your leisure." -- mark twain
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)