Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Yes, that's the one. However, it's not clear to me the fault lies in > the rule. Something is failing to write the attachment to the disk. > Isn't that done by mutt?
The attachment is written to disk, the rule invoked, and then when execution completes the attachment is removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
