2012-05-10 12:39 Gergely Nagy <alger...@madhouse-project.org>: | On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> wrote: | | > 2012-05-10 09:07 Gergely Nagy <alger...@madhouse-project.org>: | > | Jari Aalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> writes: | > | | > | > The only solution I can think of in situation where package "wine" does not | > | > exists in system, is to download winetricks directly from the project's | > | > version control. | > | | > | There's another option: faking a wine package. The equivs package comes | > | handy in cases like this. | > | > Nice. | > | > The *-4 release of winetricks will have depends on "wine-dummy" with these | > instructions in package Description: | | No need to. wine | wine-unstable is fine, you can use equivs to create | dummy packages named wine or wine-unstable, and all will be well. | | Depending on packages outside of the archive (even if it's only one of | the three possibilities that satisfy a depends) is frowned upon in the | best case. | | I do not think there is anything that needs to be changed in winetricks.
Actually I could create new package in winetricks::debian/control: winetricks-wine And add depends Depends: winetricks-wine | wine-unstable | wine To make "wineticks" self sufficient as it was for users that install wine from sources. What do you think? Jari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org