On 05/14/2012 08:18 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: > In my opinion libswt-gtk-3.5-java and libswt-3-gtk-java are not in > conflict, > generally it's ok to have them installed both. The problem is in tuxguitar > package itself which will not work with SWT 3.5. > > So I suggest that we make tuxguitar to conflict with libswt-gtk-3.5-java > (and maybe also with libswt-gtk-3.4-java and libswt-gtk-3.6-java I see > in Grant's package list too).
Hi Jakub, There are times in the past when tuxguitar explicitly depended on libswt-gtk-3.5-jar, so it seems odd to say that tuxguitar won't work with it. What seems to be the case is that tuxguitar won't work when both -3.5 and -3 packages are install. Could it be due to the version of libswt-gtk-3-java that was used when the tuxguitar binary was built? (That is, should it be a versioned dependency on libswt-gtk-3-java?) Also, I'm able to install both libswt-gtk-3.5-java and libswt-3-gtk-java in a clean chroot and still run tuxguitar without a problem. In any event, I'm not trying to contradict your assertion; merely understand it. Cheers, tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature