On 22.05.12 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: > On Mi, 16 Mai 2012, Hilmar PreuÃe wrote:
Hi, > > this is a reopening of #668562 and friends. I still found a > > document, which can be compiled using LaTeX, but not XeLaTeX and > > it still looks like a problem in xeCJK.sty. Yes, we have a > > different error message. As the document has non-ASCII chars it > > is attached. > > With the latest updated of xeCJK (now in tlpretest) the document > can be compiled, but gives a warning: > ... > (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty))) > (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/fontspec/fontspec.cfg)))) > ************************************************* > * xeCJK warning: "no-CJKfamily" > * > * It seems that you have not declare a CJKfamily. > * If you want to use xeCJK in the right way, you should use > * > * \xeCJKmainfont[...]{...} > * > * in the preamble to declare the main CJKfamily. > * > ************************************************* > (./xetex-prob.aux) (/home/norbert/tl/2012/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tipa/t3cmr.fd) > [1] (./xetex-prob.aux) ) > Output written on xetex-prob.pdf (1 page). > Transcript written on xetex-prob.log. > > > That should close the bug with the next upload, right? > At least it shouldn't give an FTBFS any more. If the document has not the expected content it is a bug in dblatex, b/c it doesn't generate correct source code. Many thanks! H. -- sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature