Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that is the right goal for tetex-base. IMO the easiest way to > achieve this goal is to reduce the number of fonts in tetex-base. [...]
I agree with you. > BTW, I just noticed that amsmath (another required part of LaTeX) is in > tetex-extra, too. Sending this mail to the bug for proper archiving. > And /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/dvipdfm/dvipdfm.def > looks like a part of graphics ... I don't think so: %% This is file `dvipdfm.def', %% and was *not* generated with the docstrip utility. %% %% It was hand edited from several docstripped def %% files that are distributed with the Graphics Bundle This looks to me as if it was derived from the graphics bundle, but is not part of it. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
