n Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > On 02.06.2012 15:31, roucaries bastien wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 01.06.2012 17:42, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> >>>> Thus we need to create a wrapper and use it on the deskop file: >>> >>> Please consider adding NotShowIn=GNOME; then. We don't want it to show >>> up in the GNOME menu. >> >> Sorry why ? Why do you not want to show display that is a >> imagemanipulation program on gnome menu ? > > The "gnome" meta package installs inkscape, which has a recommends: > imagemagick. This means imagemagick will be installed in a default GNOME > installation.
1. Yes for sure, but out of topic I think. > display.im6 overlaps with the functionality which is already provided by > eog, which is GNOME's integrated image viewer. 2. Yes and no, it a question of policy. BTW why do not ask to remove GIMP for gnome menu ? I will remove imagemagick when you will remove GIMP* > Plus, the icon of display.im6 looks ugly and it clutters the default menu. Yes, point taken next upload will add a svg icon (see #675484). Bastien * I am joking here but it is only to show you that your logic is at least flawed here. In my day jobs it is call a counterexample, and really useful to kill long mathematical development. > Michael > -- > Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the > universe are pointed away from Earth? > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
