On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 20:18:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby; > would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths?
I'd rather suggest removing gdal's ruby packages. They have no reverse deps in the archive anyway. Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature