On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> wrote: >> This wrong binary apparently may cause any kinds of harmful effects in >> certain non-trivial circumstances (see http://wiki.winehq.com/Prelink). >> >> The real cause is an old version of the prelink package which will be >> filed separately. > > Couldn't we just go ahead and get rid of prelinking to solve this? > First of all, prelink is avoided on some of the architectures anyway, > and really is the speed up using prelinking really all that > noticeable? > > My opinion is just to do away with it.
It is needed for some copy protections/DRM schemes to properly work: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1955 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13915 -- -Austin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
