Don Armstrong wrote: > unarchive 631018 > forcemerge 651912 647992 [...] > So 631018 is blocked by 647992 and is archived.
Ah, now I see. Thanks. Would it make sense to automatically unarchive blocked and merged bugs (other than the bugs explicitly mentioned) when forcibly merging, since they are not likely to be signs of typos? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
