Maybe this bug can be closed, since the man page describes the way to get both, the user.group and the us.er:group:

"[...] For backwards compatibility, "." may be used instead of ":" to separate the user and group but since "." may appear in user and group names, ambiguities can arise such as using --user=u.g with users u and u.g and group g. With such an ambiguity, daemon will assume the user u and group g. Use --user=u.g: instead for the other interpretation."

Kind regards
Marcus Blumhagen



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to