On 17.06.2012 01:39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > >> On 17.06.2012 00:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: >> >>>> But, to get rid of ia32-libs, we don't need to convert libbonobo to ma, >>>> right? Or is there another pressing need to convert libbonobo? >>> >>> We do need libbonobo:i386 for ia32-libs to keep 32bit software, >>> esspecially 3rd party 32bit apps, working. >> >> I don't see libbonobo in ia32-libs_20120102, nor is liborbit converted >> to ma [1]. > > Sorry, should have been specific and said ia32-libs-gtk.
Okay. > And yes, orbit2 also isn't converted and you could set your bug as being > blocked by it. > > But the orbit2 includes a patch so you can build a local multiarch > orbit2 package and test a multiarch libbonobo. That way they can go in > close together. No need to wait with fixing libbonobo till orbit2 is > fixed in the archive. I no longer use any package which uses liborbit, which makes testing a bit harder. This is also why I'm a bit reluctant to change the package at this point of the release cycle. If there is a realistic chance that ia32-lib(-gtk) will be converted to multiarch, then I'll try to have a look. > Ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk have to go multiarch in wheezy or be > removed. So there is a high pressure to fix the remaining 10 out of ~200 Are there tracking bugs for ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk (or a corresponding usertag)? > packages that block this. Orbit2 will probably be NMUed this weekend > given how long the patch has been sitting in the BTS. I guess that includes libidl0, a rdep of liborbit2? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature