On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:22:13AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > or, as an alternative, fold libixml.so.2 and libthreadutil.so.6 into > libupnp6. > Given how small those two libraries are, I'm wondering what the benefit > is, of splitting them up.
Hi, You're right of course. It's just the way upstream inherited it from Intel. Threadutil is only a wrapper for $THREADLIB anyway and libixml has turned out not to be used elsewhere. Perhaps a quick solution would be to bump them all in step ... I apologise for the breakage in this transition which I missed in planning it, but libupnp3 is now no longer in testing and squeeze->wheezy should cope with this sort of thing. Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
