On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:55:40PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: > > * The description still contains the homepage. > > Hmm, is it a problem? I don't see nothing about it in the Debian Policy [1]. > That lintian note was about missed homepage field which is possibly present > in > description. > > [1] > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description
This is not a problem. The information is just redundant, i.e. it adds no value to the description. But this is just my opinion. > > All of these problems are minor, so I would like to see this (or an > > improved version) uploaded before the freeze. > > So do I. But it is too hard to find the sponsor. Not mailing lists, nor new > pseudo-package didn't help me yet. It is quite late in the release process for a QA upload. This can prevent people from uploading your changes. > > If this doesn't happen, I > > will need someone to sponsor a NMU and a get a freeze exception which > > means more work for the release team. > > Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with increasing > of > version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team. Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in. So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU does just that. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
