On 25/06/12 02:14, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> Generally, Debian packages stable releases of software. At the current
>> state is this package ready for unstable or better suited for
>> experimental? Has it seen wider testing / user base? (e.g. did you post
>> an announce to ext-dev mailing lists? LWN.net? similar sites).
>>
>> This is a bit of chicken and egg problem: no package no user base, no
>> user base no package.
>>
>> I believe that inclusion of this package in Debian will increase testing.
>>
>> Do you believe this should be uploaded into experimental or unstable?
> 
> Exactly.  I was planning on announcing it once it's in the archive to call 
> for testing and feedback.  The usage of experimental is still unclear to me.  
> If it is in unstable then it will be synced to Ubuntu quantal as well, though 
> I suppose Ubuntu users can get it from my ppa if it is holding in 
> experimental for now.
> 

Your decision whether you upload into Debian experimental or unstable
should not be affected by other derivative distribution policies. You
can request syncing packages from experimental into Ubuntu, but the
package will still land in Ubuntu's new queue and require verification.
You can always provide backports/ppa/etc regardless of the package
status in the archive.

Given above, unstable or experimental?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitrijs.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to