On Wed, 2012-27-06 at 10:03 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Given that the perl modules in question clearly contain "OpenSSL" in > their names, this appears to only be satisfied under one of the > following conditions: > > 0) a perl module is not a "product" > 1) these perl modules are not "derived from" OpenSSL
I think this is the best argument. > 2) the OpenSSL Project has given these modules explicit permission > 3) this clause is considered unenforceable and/or somehow > illegitimate It's unenforcable if the modules in question do not incorporate any OpenSSL code and are just an interface to the library. I think this is probably the case. There seem to be between 30 and 40 modules on CPAN with OpenSSL in the name and no-one seems to be bothered. -- --gh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org