On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 20:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 19:06 +0000, shawn wrote: > > If -2 cannot be unblocked, (and sponsored) 1.2.76-1 (which is the first > > version of this package > > in Debian), should not be part of Wheezy. > > We'd need to see a diff against -1 to know if it might be suitable. See > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html for further details, > as referenced in the d-d-a mail. > > Looking further, it appears that kyotocabinet is currently not in wheezy > at all? In that case -1 only got an unblock initially because it was in > unstable in time (having been accepted from NEW the day before the > freeze); we might need a little more convincing that -2 should get one > having turned out to be buggy so quickly. (Well, I might, ommv...) Well, the RC bug (which I reported) was fixed very early in mentors, (all with same version number) but apparently the later version did not get uploaded. I could not download what was in NEW, but I did notice immediately after it got accepted.
If the default behavior is to not have kyotocabinet in wheezy, then I am OK with that. -- -Shawn Landden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org