On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:40:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > > > Package: luajit > > > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > > > Severity: grave > > > Tags: upstream > > > > > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but > > > rather > > > be made available via backports. > > > > Sooo, how is ulatencyd affected? It just lists libluajit-5.1-dev as an > > alternative build dependency of liblua5.1-0-dev (to let people rebuild the > > packages with luajit support without problems) but does not actually use > > it. I > > don't see this as a problem, am I wrong? > > > No, that looks fine.
Ok, closing (the correct bug) then.
Thanks
--
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
