On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 07:34:21PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 05.07.2012 19:12, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Package: udisks2 > > Version: 1.98.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FHS
> > udisks2 has taken to mounting user filesystems under /run/media. This > > directly contradicts the FHS, which says /media is to be used for mounting > > removeable media. > > This is therefore a serious policy violation in the udisks2 package. > > This bug has also been reported upstream and upstream has refused to correct > > the issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51709 > We've implemented /run despite it not being in the FHS. We've implemented /run, as a special exception approved in Debian Policy, for those bits of the filesystem previously stored in /var/run and /var/lock. No such exception has been granted for /media, nor should there be. > If there are good technical arguments for mounting removable media under > /run/media (and I notice a few in the upstream bug report), I don't see > why we shouldn't consider diverging from the FHS here. No, there are no good technical arguments for the move. There's a technical justification given for creating per-user subdirectories, there is *not* a technical reason for the move to /run. This is a gratuitous incompatibility with the FHS. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature