Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> writes:

> I don't see the point of having emacs from src:emacs24 depending
> on emacs23. IMHO, you should have kept
>
> Package: emacs
> Source: emacs23
> Version: 23.4+1-3
>
> and the emacs24 source shouldn't have an emacs binary package until
> it is ready to depend on emacs24.

Ahh, I see.  I think you're right -- that would have been a better
approach.  I might attempt this for wheezy, but only if the release team
is amenable (assuming they're still willing to consider emacs24 at all,
if/when I can track down the i386 build failure).

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to