On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 05:03:25PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 07:23:33PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > reassign 293686 geda-gschem > > retitle 293686 geda-gschem: uninstallable in unstable > > tags 293686 sid > > clone 293686 -1 > > reassign -1 geda-gnetlist > > retitle -1 geda-gnetlist: uninstallable in unstable > > thanks
> > This is not a bug in geda, it's a bug in the packages depended on. It's > > also specific to the new version that's only in sid, so tagged as such. > Actually, they're just waiting on libgeda22 to be processed in incoming, > so it's not exactly a bug at all. possibly so, but these versions of the packages aren't going anywhere until libgeda22 is accepted anyway, so might as well have the bugs in the right place to document the issue. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
