On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:17:11PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Debian kernel maintainer Bastian Blank writes, at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/680537:
> > 
> >    The netfilter rules are a shared resource. There is no synchronization,
> >    so the admin have the last word. As kernel maintainer, I see it similar
> >    to a configuration file, so ยง10.7 policy applies.
> > 
> >    The purpose of openvswitch is to provide support for switching, not to
> >    setup filter rules. This means it violates the principle of least
> >    surprise.
> > 
> > I believe that the argument by analogy to configuration files is weak,
> > given that the Debian policy section in question is very specifically about
> > files, not about general principles.  On the other hand, Debian does not
> > install any firewall by default, so the presence of a rule that blocks GRE
> > traffic is a sign that the administrator has taken an explicit action to
> > install a firewall that blocks GRE, and therefore it is rather rude to
> > override this.  Therefore, this patch simply turns off this behavior on
> > Debian, given that in ordinary Debian installations it will have no
> > adverse effect on Open vSwitch.
> 
> FWIW, I am in complete agreement with Ben on this.

Want to give me an Acked-by?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to