owner 682274 ! tags 682274 + confirmed thanks On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 17:40 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Package: ledgersmb > Severity: wishlist > > Upstream has two new releases after what is in sid, we should upgrade,
Oh, I quite agree and I posted regarding my plans on getting there earlier today to the package & ledgersmb-develop mailing lists: On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 08:58 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 10:28 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: >> I did get a start on packaging 1.3.19 (which has both upstream & >> debian related fixes) but ran into an issue with packaging for an >> upstream change that I haven't had time to resolve. > > That change is the one for the new (with v1.3.19) css file system > configuration variable ("$fs_cssdir"), which I could not get to work. > (I also had some issues with my test systems, though, that I've since > resolved.) Now that I've merged the 1.3.18-2 Debian package changes, > I'll get back to working on that issue again. Once that's been > resolved, I'll go on to work on packaging v1.3.20 and it'll be at > least that version (along with v1.3.19) that will in the next > Debian upload. On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 17:40 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > and I think we should consider asking for a freeze exception, as > apparently (according to the release notes), 1.3.20 is more stable. I'd already been thinking about using such reasoning for 1.3.19; I'll check into that for 1.3.20 as well. There's also a fix & update for one of the LedgerSMB locale/po files in v1.3.20 (Debian #678281), which also may help. RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org