> But then please don't spend your night on that particular package. While I > was replying to you, someone raised a bug (#683331) that should probably > be fixed before tahoe-lafs would be included in wheezy. So I'll probably > close this one, and schedule inclusion for Wheezy+1 if possible (cause it > means packaging new python modules, yeepi, glad to learn that *now*)
Hm, #683331 is that tahoe-lafs exits immediately with an error on startup if there is no "ifconfig" executable, which means tahoe-lafs package depends on the net-tools package. That is just as true of Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.1 as of 1.9.2, so the existence of that bug is probably not a reason to leave 1.9.1 in Wheezy. I would recommend that you upgrade to 1.9.2 (after Julien inspects the changes), and also that you fix #683331 by adding a dependency on net-tools. Julien: whether or not Tahoe-LAFS gets upgraded from 1.9.1 to 1.9.2 in Wheezy, I am very interested in the results of your inspection of the diff. If there are any questionable changes in there, I would like to hear about it. Regards, Zooko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org