Quoting Marco M. F. De santis ([email protected]): > Il 30/07/2012 15:55, Christian PERRIER ha scritto: > >If you approve this process, please let us know by replying to this > >mail. If some work in progress on your side would conflict with such a > >rewrite (such as adding or removing debconf templates), please say so, > >and we will defer the review to later in the development cycle. > > I should release a new version, in a month or so, that will add a > couple of debconf questions about password and username. So proceed > as you think it's better, doing the review now and later another one > for the new questions, or everithing later.
I would *very* much prefer if we could work on these questions now. The whole review process is fairly long as we need time for review, last chance for comments, maintainer's approval of rewrites, call for translations, etc. So doing this twice is possible but quite painful (remember that your package is not the only one in the process....at some moments, I can have up to 5 or 6 packages going through this process). How about already adding the templates now even if you don't have the code to handle them?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
