On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 à 18:37 +0930, Ron a écrit : > > > You should just rebuild the package against gdk-imlib11, that's all. > > > That package is linked against libpng12, as libpng2/libpng10 has been > > > removed as well.
> > In this case I just need to fix the build-dep from png10 -> png12, > > (for the bits I'm responsible for) but I guess I missed the memo > > that we were rolling on that this week. I'm not unhappy that it's > > happening, just surprised at how... > D'uh, I'm really sorry, I must have missed libwxgtk2.4 when filing bug > reports asking for the rebuild. Sorry about that. There's actually no good reason for wxgtk2.4 to build-depend on libpng2-dev, AFAICT, because *none* of the binary packages it builds depend on libpng10-0. So I wonder why this build dependency is there... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
