On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello Duncan, > Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less > efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4. > > Symptoms are a ton of spam with BAYES_50, sa-learn not increasing > the bayesian probability most of the time (but some time it does) > seen by spamassassin -t, and an overall increase of false-negative. > > I tried sa-learn --import, but it was apparently a noop. > sa-learn --lint did not complain either. > > I installed a sarge chroot to test: Sarge sa-learn and spamassassin > seems to perform much better with the same spams and the same bayesian > database and the same configuration.
Can you provide the output of sa-learn --dump magic --debug please? -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
