Package: doc-debian
Version: today's CVS
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi,

Now that non-free documentation is being removed from the main archive,
I expect lots of questions about this to get asked.  A FAQ entry on this
therefore would be nice.  Attached is a patch.

BTW, I'll file a pile of extra bugreports: I've been proofreading the
entire FAQ, and have quite some more in my personal queue.  If you feel
my patches (#333504, #333511) have been OK, you might want to give me
commit-rights.  I myself don't really care, sending patches using BTS is
fine with me too.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost


--- software.sgml.orig  2005-10-12 10:15:55.012020834 +0200
+++ software.sgml       2005-10-13 13:37:01.745004041 +0200
@@ -154,6 +154,27 @@
 considered obsolete. Please remove any mentions to non-US from your
 sources in your <file>/etc/apt/sources.list</file> configuration file.
 
+<sect id="doc">Where is the documentation for my package?
+
+<p>Lots of popular documentation-specific licenses are not compatible with the
+Debian Free Software Guidelines.  Therefore, such documentation is not included
+in the Debian main archive.  Examples of such licenses are the GNU Free
+Documentation License (see this <url
+id="http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml"; name="Draft
+Debian Position Statement about the GNU Free Documentation License(GFDL)">) as
+well as the various CC licenses (see this <url
+id="http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html"; name="debian-legal Summary
+of Creative Commons 2.0 Licenses">).  Examples of affected packages are <url
+id="http://bugs.debian.org/280803"; name="gcc-4.0-doc"> and <url
+id="http://bugs.debian.org/181494"; name="glibc-doc">.
+
+<p>The documentation you are looking for might be in the non-free area, or
+not distributed by Debian at all.
+
+<p>If you are using Debian <em>sarge</em>, documentation which is not DFSG
+compliant might be included in main: most of the work on this issue has been
+done after the <em>sarge</em> release.
+
 <sect id="pine">Where is pine?
 
 <p>Due to its restrictive license, it's in the non-free area. Moreover,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to