severity 668354 wishlist thanks I had a look at LSB and it agrees with Debian policy in that it also requires calling a command rather than manipulating symlinks directly.
http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initsrcinstrm.html During the installer's post-install processing phase the program /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd must be called to activate the init script. Activation consists of arranging for the init script to be called in the correct order on system run-level changes (including system boot and shutdown), based on dependencies supplied in the init script (see Comment Conventions for Init Scripts). The install_initd command should be thought of as a wrapper which hides the implementation details; how any given implementation arranges for the init script to be called at the appropriate time is not specified. As such I don't think this warrants an RC bug. I'm downgrading it to wishlist. Personally I'd close or mark it wontfix, but I'll leave that up to the maintainer. -- Marcin Owsiany <porri...@debian.org> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 2048R/02F946FC 35E9 1344 9F77 5F43 13DD 6423 DBF4 80C6 02F9 46FC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
