Dear Mentors, I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. In August, I split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves around 100 Mb when deploying to a fresh server. This change was requested by several users, e.g.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel/6108/focus=6110 Could someone check it and approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no longer a DD. It now builds these binary packages: 0install-core (contains the code) 0install (metapackage that depends on 0install-core and GTK) zeroinstall-injector (transitional package so that using the old package name still works) I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now "0install". The upstream project will use the new package name in the 1.12 release. This bug is linked from the project's news page, if confirmation is needed that we approve of this change: http://0install.net/news.html To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net. Regards, T. Leonard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
