On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:19 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > > Please unblock package osm2pgsql.
> > >
> > > Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the
> > > changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug
> > > #687965.
> >
> > The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt
> > in line with the 32- to 64-bit change. Would that happen automatically,
> > or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading?
>
> They're expected to do that on their own.
>
> However, I noticed that osm2pgsql/testing already used BIGINT columns for
> osm_id
> (BIGINT == int_8), maybe for some other bug of the software (which created 64
> bit columns even though one asked for 32 bit). I haven't checked the version
> in
> stable.
0.69+r20104-2 (squeeze) has:
#define CREATE_PLACE_TABLE \
"CREATE TABLE place (" \
" place_id BIGINT," \
" osm_type CHAR(1) NOT NULL," \
" osm_id BIGINT NOT NULL," \
That would imply that the field is already 64-bit even in stable?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
