* Aaron M. Ucko <a...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 3 would have been in lieu of 2, which is in retrospect a better choice in this
> case, and will give you the opportunity to tighten liblttng-ctl0's own shlibs
> while you're at it. Please take care to have ltt-control build-depend on
> a version of liburcu-dev with this fix. (I presume liburcu-dev already
> Depends: liburcu1 (= ${binary:Version}.)Ahh, good advice. Thanks. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
