On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Looking at the error, it's not a segfault, whouldn't lead to a security > issue. It's "just" unsupported functionality, even if it doesn't error > out gracefully. > > So does it really justify RC status? Don't get me wrong: I don't want to > hide issues, and we probably need to replace the abort() case with sth. > more useable. Just don't have a fast solution for today. Sounds like important to me, but I'm not very experienced.
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
