On 2012-10-05 21:26, Frank Kuester wrote: > I'm not competely sure without checking out older versions, but I > _think_ that they are conffiles in squeeze, but they were managed by ucf > in the later versions of TeXLive 2009 (2010?) in unstable and probably > wheezy. > > Therefore one could argue we should rather leave in the code for people > that did irregular upgrades to unstable or testing. However, I don't > care much about anyone running testing or unstable early in the release > cycle and then stopping to track updates - TL 2012 is in sid for months > now.
Once I did various piuparts upgrade tests from all old versions in snapshots for nvidia-graphics-drivers (to learn about all the diversions that were never cleaned up properly). I don't really want to repeat this :-) But currently I'm testing all the possible upgrade paths from squeeze, wheezy and sid for Norbert's new packages (excluding texlive-full) - that's ideal to test some new piuparts features :-) Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
