ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: > Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:57:58 +0900
Many thanks for this. > * chapterbib.sty: no license information > > there is a README that states: > They are all released under a very simple permissive license in > the MIT/BSD style: They may be freely used, transmitted, reproduced, > or modified provided that [the copyright and permission] notice is > left intact. I didn't notice this, or maybe it wasn't present (in teTeX, CTAN, ...) when I first checked. I have no idea why so many of the files have a license statement inside that it seems I didn't notice. Well. > + * relsize.sty: "public domain", nothing else > % This software is contributed to the public domain. When I wrote this, I was under the impression that, since public domain doesn't exist in many jurisdictions, the term needs clarification. I don't think we need to insist on this, in particular not if Donald is from the US (which I don't know). Again, thank you very much, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
