On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:02:56PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > The underlying issue is that asterisk fails to provide proper shlibs
> > hinting, so that packages building against asterisk do not get versioned
> > binary dependencies that can reveal leed for binNMU later on. That
> ? binary dependencies that can reveal need for binNMU later on. That
> > underlying issue needs to be reported against asterisk and fixed there.
>
> The Debian maintainers of asterisk are in the Cc.
The "library" in question is /usr/sbin/asterisk . However:
$ dpkg-gensymbols -O -pasterisk -e/usr/sbin/asterisk -d
Scanning /usr/sbin/asterisk for symbol information
File /usr/sbin/asterisk doesn't have a soname. Ignoring.
Is there any way to force an SONAME (the major version number of
Asterisk)?
Also note that the res_* modules of asterisk may have exported modules
(some other modules also have public symbols as well, but this shouldn't
have happened).
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
